Oakland Sues to Block Sale of Stadium Land to A's
A Superior Court judge issued a temporary order to block Alameda County’s Coliseum land sale to the Oakland A’s, after the city of Oakland sued the county over the sale. The A’s proposed tearing down and redeveloping the RingCentral Coliseum site, on top of their plans for a new ballpark at the Howard Terminal site. In April, Alameda County moved forward with the sale its 50 percent share of the 155-acre site for $85 million. Oakland owns the other half of the property. And the Oakland City Council has since contended that the county’s sale is in violation of California’s Surplus Land Act, a state law that requires publicly owned surplus lands to be considered for affordable housing, and for owners to negotiate “in good faith,” with affordable housing developers for 90 days before the lands are sold or leased. County officials say they have been in discussions with the city to sell their half of the site to the city since 2015, but that the city has failed to reach a deal. Oakland mayor Libby Schaff objects to the city council’s lawsuit, and hopes to reach a deal with the county without going to court. “It is so easy to put a lawsuit on pause while we try and resolve things diplomatically,” she said. “And I think that is in the best interest of taxpayers. Governments should be working together and not against each other."
Vallco Mall Developer Sues Cupertino
In the latest back-and-forth before the November ruling over Cupertino’s Vallco Mall redevelopment plan, the plan’s developer has sued the city. The city and the developer Sand Hill have been engaged in a months-long skirmish over the planned development, which was approved through state law SB 35 that requires streamlined approval of certain developments that meet affordable requirements. Plans includes 2402 apartment units, 400,000 square feet of retail and 1.8 million square feet of office space. Since its approval, the city council has attempted to block the plan, and recently approved a general plan amendment from the site that eliminated the office space and imposed a 60-foot height limit took a step to block the company from including more office space in its plans. In response, Sand Hill filed a lawsuit against the city alleging that this approach would render affordable units infeasible – resulting in a potential loss of “tens or hundreds of millions of dollars”. In August, the state got involved: with a letter warning the city that they could violate state law if housing fails to materialize at Vallco. Last week, the city released nine-page memo of a study by Hausrath Economics that shows that at least two scenarios for housing projects that are financially feasible. Until the November hearing, Sand Hill has been moving forward with construction: they have demolished several sites on the West side of the mall. (See prior CP&DR coverage.)
Caltrans Issues Concerning Climate Change Reports for S. California Districts
The California Department of Transportation updated its climate change vulnerability reports for three major districts, examining how extreme weather will impact transportation infrastructure like roads and bridges. The areas included in the September update are District 7, Los Angeles and Ventura counties; District 8, Riverside and San Bernardino counties; and District 11, San Diego and Imperial counties. In District 7, CalTrans noted that District 7’s high population and dense highway infrastructure will create particular vulnerabilities to temperature rise, sea level rise and storm surge, heavy rain events, and wildfire. Its district resiliency plan includes raising and realigning roadways to prevent highway inundation from sea level rise and coastal erosion, as well as keeping landscaping “fire-safe” with high-moisture plants. In District 8, key vulnerabilities focus on roadways though wilderness areas susceptible to wildfire and sudden extreme storm events. Risk mitigation plans include reinforcing bridges for sudden storm events, and fire-proofing CalTrans facilities, and considering high temperatures for CalTrans worker schedules. District 11 was considered one of the most vulnerabile areas in the state: with areas threatened by future erosion, sea level rise, wildfire, extreme heat, and sudden storms. The resiliency plan includes long-term pavement heat protection, flood mitigation, fire mitigation, and erosion control.
Feds Back Down from Proposed Delta Water Plan
Following pushback from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, the federal Bureau of Reclamation walked back its plans to push more water through the Delta to Central Valley communities. The Trump administration has been trying to increase water deliveries to the Valley throughout its term, and had planned to deliver on the promise this fall. However, the state department of Fish and Wildlife protested, citing harmful impacts on endangered fish species, including the Chinook salmon. The Delta provides much of the north-to-south delivery of water, and is often caught in the crosshairs of water agency battles between the Central Valley and Southern California. And, despite this temporary allowance, the Trump administration is still moving forward with sweeping plans to ease environmental restrictions and pump more water south long-term. “It really wasn’t in their best interest to go to war with the state on this one,” Jeffrey Mount, water policy expert at the Public Policy Institute of California told the Sacramento Bee. “Sometimes, strategic retreat is a good thing.”
Bay Area Leaders Detail $100 Billion Transportation Bond Measure
Bay Area transportation leaders are planning a massive $100 billion tax measure that would fund projects like a second bay crossing and low-income fare discounts. The combined efforts of the Bay Area Council, the Silicon Valley Leadership Group, and the urban planning think tank Spur are devising the mega-measure, called Faster Bay Area. Backers of the bill describe broad goals, such as better integration of the region’s transit systems and major rail and freeway infrastructure improvements. But the second bay crossing is among its foremost projects. The list of projects involved has not been finalized, but several key works will be included, including the much-discussed second rail line across the San Francisco Bay. The current single-tunnel BART line from the East Bay into San Francisco runs overcapacity. Plans for a second line, either a second tunnel or a bridge line, would also include Caltrain and Amtrak capability. The measure is planned to be put to voters in November 2020.