CP&DR

Rent Control: Nine Month Residents Win Protection of Santa Cruz County Ordinance

Jun 1, 2000

CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Vol. 15 No. 06 Jun 2000

A county's mobilehome rent control ordinance applies for people who live in recreational vehicles for at least nine continuous months, the Sixth District Court of Appeal has ruled. The court said that Santa Cruz County's Mobilehome Rent Adjustment Ordinance applies to about 20 sites in a travel trailer and resort facility because residents of those sites have lived there continuously for nine months or more. The controversy began when Willows Resort owner Harold Griffith eliminated central g...

General Plans: El Dorado County Environmentalists Might Gain Attorneys' Fees Yet

Jun 1, 2000

CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Vol. 15 No. 06 Jun 2000

A citizens group and an environmental organization do have a right to attorneys' fees in successful litigation regarding El Dorado County's handling of a large subdivision, the Third District Court of Appeal has ruled. However, the court tempered that right by saying that the aesthetic protections won by the groups and their members should be a factor in the awarding of fees. In other words, because they gained aesthetic protections, the groups might not get as much in attorneys' fees as they wou...

Rent Control: Path Cleared for Mobilehome Park Owners in Federal Court

Jun 1, 2000

CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Vol. 15 No. 06 Jun 2000

Mobilehome park owners in the City of Montclair can proceed with a federal lawsuit alleging that the city's rent control law is a regulatory taking, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled. A federal district court had dismissed the lawsuit filed by mobilehome park owners because a similar suit was making its way through the state court system (see CP&DR Legal Digest January, 2000). However, the litigation ended early this year when the state Supreme Court refused to review an appell...

Rent Control: Santa Monica Ordinance Can't Supercede State Law, Court Rules

Jun 1, 2000

CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Vol. 15 No. 06 Jun 2000

Portions of Santa Monica's rent control law have been thrown out by an appellate court because the provisions conflicted with state law. The Second District Court of Appeal said Santa Monica could not modify conditions established by state law under which landlords can increase rents for voluntarily vacated units, and the city cannot demand more information than state law requires when registering rent-controlled units. In reviewing the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act of 1995 (Civ. Code §1954.50), th...

CERCLA: Both Polluters LIable for Cleaning ‘Mixed Plume,' Ninth Circuit Rules

May 1, 2000

CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Vol. 15 No. 05 May 2000

When two companies contribute to groundwater pollution, one company cannot avoid cleanup costs by arguing that the other company would have spent money on the cleanup anyway, the U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled. The decision came in an Oregon case interpreting the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), better known as the Superfund law. To let one company avoid cleanup costs "would encourage parties to avoid investigating and cleaning up con...

Court Establishes New Test for ‘Paper Subdivisions': Title Must Have Transferred; Map Alone Not Enough to Create Parcel

May 1, 2000

CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Vol. 15 No. 05 May 2000

Parcels delineated in pre-1893 subdivisions do not exist as separate lots unless there has been a transfer of title at some point, the Second District Court of Appeal has ruled. In addressing the status of antiquated subdivisions, the court ruled squarely in favor of local governments that have fought to prevent legal recognition of "paper subdivisions" created prior to laws regulating the subdivision of land. In answering an unresolved issue of state subdivision law, the court said that the ti...

Proposition 218: Home Occupation Fee Withstands Challenge From Taxpayer Group

May 1, 2000

CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Vol. 15 No. 05 May 2000

A City of Los Angeles home occupation permit fee has survived a legal challenge from the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association. The Second District Court of Appeal ruled that the Jarvis lawsuit was filed too late, that the organization failed to follow administrative procedures for refunds and that a later repeal of the fee made claims for injunctive and declaratory relief moot. The court said a lawsuit challenging such fees must be brought within 90 days of their enactment so municipalities can have fi...

NEPA: Ninth Circuit Orders Environmental Study of Completed Interchange

May 1, 2000

CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Vol. 15 No. 05 May 2000

The U.S. Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered preparation of an environmental study on an already-completed freeway interchange in Washington state. On a 2-1 ruling, the three-judge panel said that the project was not exempt under the National Environmental Policy Act. "While we decline to order the interchange torn down, we direct the district court to order the requisite environmental review …" the court concluded. In 1985, the City of DuPont, between Seattle and Tacoma, identified t...

Supreme Court: Scalia Calls S.F. Housing Law ‘Extortion,' But Court Won't Review

May 1, 2000

CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Vol. 15 No. 05 May 2000

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review a takings case involving a San Francisco housing law, but Associate Justice Antonin Scalia issued a scathing dissent in which he equated San Francisco's law with extortion and questioned a state appellate court's willingness to follow "takings" precedents. Ten years ago, San Francisco rejected the application of Claude and Micheline Lambert, who asked to convert 24 units of their Cornell Hotel from residential to tourist use. San Francisco's hotel c...

Supreme Court:

May 1, 2000

CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Vol. 15 No. 05 May 2000

Property rights advocates suffered a second setback when the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a takings case from Florida. A man and his mother had purchased 40 acres, including 32 acres of swampland, in 1973 and began attempting to develop a housing tract and marina in 1980. They received state and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers permits in the early 1980s, but one state agency asked Monroe County to reconsider the project. The landowners sued and won, and the county again granted approvals...

Articles