CP&DR

CEQA Guidelines Changes Downplay Automobiles

Nov 9, 2009

California, California Environmental Quality Act, CP&DR Staff, In Brief, Vol. 24 No. 15 Nov 2009 - 1

The Natural Resources Agency has altered proposed amendments to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines. The changes appear to shift the focus of environmental analysis away from a project's effects on automobile traffic and toward impact on the overall transportation system.

City Permitted To Reject Potentially Feasible Project Alternatives

Oct 7, 2009

California Environmental Quality Act, CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Santa Cruz County, Vol. 24 No. 13 Oct 2009 - 1

A city may determine that project alternatives once considered potentially feasible for California Environmental Quality Act analysis are infeasible as actual projects, the Sixth District Court of Appeal has ruled.

Disapproved Project Doesn't Need EIR, Court Rules

Oct 7, 2009

California Environmental Quality Act, CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Los Angeles County, Vol. 24 No. 13 Oct 2009 - 1

The City of Los Angeles had no obligation under the California Environmental Quality Act to complete an environmental impact report for a project that it had rejected, the Second District Court of Appeal has ruled.

The court dismissed all arguments put forward by the developer of the 555-acre Las Lomas project at the junction of Interstate 5 and Highway 14. "[I]f an agency at any time decides not to proceed with a project," the court said, "CEQA is inapplicable from that time forward."

Football Stadium Lawsuit Settled

Oct 6, 2009

California Environmental Quality Act, CP&DR Staff, Featured Articles, Los Angeles County, Vol. 24 No. 13 Oct 2009 - 1

Forced into negotiations by the state Legislature, the City of Walnut has dropped its lawsuit contesting the adequacy of an environmental impact report for a proposed professional football stadium and 3 million-square-foot entertainment complex in the neighboring City of Industry.

First Opinion Published On CEQA Energy Analysis

Oct 5, 2009

California Environmental Quality Act, Legal Digest, Paul Shigley, San Joaquin County, Vol. 24 No. 13 Oct 2009 - 1

A city may determine that a project has no significant effects on energy consumption if it exceeds the California Building Energy Efficiency Standards, the Third District Court of Appeal has ruled. The ruling appears to be the first on an environmental impact report's analysis of how a project might affect energy use, an area of the California Environmental Quality Act receiving increased attention because of concerns about climate change.

Controversial Bottling Plant Proposal Dropped

Sep 18, 2009

California Environmental Quality Act, CP&DR Staff, Featured Articles, Siskiyou County, Vol. 24 No. 12 Sep 2009 - 2

A project that had become a California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) lightning rod has apparently died. Nestlé Waters North America notified the McCloud Community Services District that it is dropping plans to convert a closed lumber mill in Siskiyou County into a water-bottling plant because it is building the facility in Sacramento instead.

Long Beach Suit Over Planned LAUSD High School Rejected

Sep 2, 2009

California Environmental Quality Act, CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Los Angeles County, Vol. 24 No. 11 Sep 2009 - 1

The Los Angeles Unified School District has successfully defended against a City of Long Beach lawsuit that challenged numerous aspects of a new high school's environmental impact report.

County Attorney Guidance Withheld From Project Opponents

Jul 1, 2009

California Environmental Quality Act, CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Tehama County, Vol. 24 No. 07 Jul 2009 - 1

Tehama County did not have to disclose publicly advice it received from an outside law firm on how to comply with the California Environmental Quality Act while dealing with a controversial development project, the Third District Court of Appeal has ruled. The unanimous three-judge panel ruled that the four documents were protected by attorney-client privilege or work product privilege, even though Tehama County shared the documents with the project's developer.

No EIR Needed For Warehouse Covered By Specific Plan, Court Rules

Jun 24, 2009

California Environmental Quality Act, CP&DR Staff, Legal Digest, Riverside County, Vol. 24 No. 07 Jul 2009 - 1

Approval of an 88-acre warehouse distribution facility at March Air Reserve Base was exempt from environmental review because the project was included in a general plan and a specific plan, both of which received environmental analysis, the Fourth District Court of Appeal has ruled.

CEQA Guidelines Proposed For GHG Emissions Analysis

Apr 29, 2009

California, California Environmental Quality Act, Environment Watch, Paul Shigley, Vol. 24 No. 05 May 2009

The Governor's Office of Planning and Research has completed proposed California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines for greenhouse gas emissions. The guidelines now move to the Natural Resources Agency, which intends to invite additional comment and conduct at least two public hearings this summer before releasing a final version.